Secularism is an old song
that keeps reverberating in the liberal, enlightened, progressive, leftist, and
socialist circles of Pakistan .
Earlier this January news from Bangladesh
that its supreme court banned use of religion by political parties provided a
fresh impetus to the choir. Since then a plethora of op-ed appreciating and
envying this progressive step of Bangladesh continues appearing in
the newspapers. They all regret Pakistan ’s
lagging behind in this important improvement.
In Pakistan , secularists have always
been understood to mean something that is, harshly to mildly, against religion.
However, their position is quite different: they hold that the state ought to
be acting in an areligious manner instead of playing religious. They aim at
neutralizing the state’s role vis-à-vis religion.
But has the Pakistani left built
its position philosophically? Or is it just a political ploy? An act of
postponing it for a convenient future date to confront? Whatever the Pakistani
leftists have intellectualized seems to ignore the tenacity of the religious
factor! That makes their approach an idealistic one.
Another entity in Pakistan ,
Classical Liberals or Libertarians, believe otherwise. Their position though
not based on the constitution of 1973 is akin to many of the fundamental rights
ensured in it. The articles that relate to the issue under discussion here are freedom
of speech (19), freedom of association (17), freedom of assembly (16)
generally; and freedom to profess religion and to manage religious institutions
(20), safeguard against taxation for purposes of any particular religion (21),
and safeguards as to educational institutions in respect of religion (22)
especially.
In essence, these
constitutional articles presume individual citizens of Pakistan as independent
thinking beings. They consider them as believing many a different views,
opinions, philosophies, and professing various religious systems of thought as
well. That is why the constitution secures the above-mentioned rights (16, 17
and 19) as fundamental to them. More than that, by way of association and
assembly it provides the individual citizens with the rights (20, 21 and 22) to
practice their views, opinions, philosophies and religious thoughts as well. Obviously
rights 20, 21 and 22 are integral to rights 16, 17 and 19. One group of rights
is just meaningless without the other.
Likewise the Libertarians too
consider individual persons as free and independent thinking beings naturally
endowed with certain inalienable rights that include right to life and property
(Articles 9, and 23 and 24), and to a life of their choice as all the rights (Articles
4, and 8 to 28) in unison aim at ensuring. That is why the Libertarians in Pakistan do not
favor secularism as a viable political philosophy. They hold personal freedom
as supreme and see the constitution of 1973 truly embodying this spirit in the
form of fundamental rights and unequivocally declaring all the laws
inconsistent or in derogation of these rights to be void (Article 8).
For Libertarians, religious
freedom is an inseparable part of this natural personal freedom that the
constitution of 1973 so purposefully protects. This position is also tenable
with the larger scheme of fundamental rights of individual citizens enumerated
in the constitution. Thus protecting religious freedom as a fundamental right
is not only morally, spiritually, and intellectually of greater merit but is socially
harmonious also.
In contrast to this, the
Pakistani secularists expect and somehow demand from the state and via it from
the individual citizens to act in an ariligious manner. On the one hand, this
amounts to denying individual persons their due fundamental right to religious
freedom, and on the other, this invalidates the constitution of 1973 and
especially its articles 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, and 22. Instead the liberals,
progressives, leftists, and socialists of Pakistan should be putting their
energies to pressurize the government to strictly implement fundamental rights generally;
and to secure especially the fundamental right to religious freedom to all the
individual citizens of Pakistan
without any discrimination. That’s the urgent need of the times!
[This article was completed on March 8, 2010. ]
©
The Blogger
All rights reserved. No part of the contents published on this Blog – Notes from Pakistan may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of The Blogger.
All rights reserved. No part of the contents published on this Blog – Notes from Pakistan may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of The Blogger.
Secularism is a very vague terminology in politics, and that is why many fables and demons are spinned around this term. In fact, secularism is a shadow of nothing, in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteThe only correct direction for any human society existing on this earth is the adoption and implementation of THE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS. This is IMPOSSIBLE without exercising and institutionalizing RULE OF LAW by all segments of the society.